Spouses Buado v. Court of Appeals Case Digest

Spouses Buado v. Court of Appeals G.R. No. 145222 April 24, 2009 Facts: Spouses Roberto and Venus Buado filed a complaint against Erlinda Nicol for slander. The trial court rendered a decision ordering Erlinda to pay the damages. The decision reached the Supreme Court but was affirmed, and it became final and executory on MarchContinue reading “Spouses Buado v. Court of Appeals Case Digest”

US v. Pons Case Digest

US v. Pons 34 Phil 729 Digest by Kirk Yngwie Enriquez Facts:Gabino Beliso, Juan Pons, and Jacinto Lasarte were charged with illegal importation of opium. On the 5th or 6th of April 1915, the Spanish steamer Lopez y Lopez arrived at Manila from Spain bringing 25 barrels which were manifested as wine and consigned to JacintoContinue reading “US v. Pons Case Digest”

Mabanag v. Lopez Vito Case Digest

Mabanag v. Lopez Vito78 Phil 1 Digest by Kirk Yngwie Enriquez Facts:This is a petitioner for prohibition to prevent the congressional resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the Philippines to be appended as an ordinance thereto. Petitioners are 8 senators, 17 representatives, and the presidents of the Democratic Alliance, the Popular Front andContinue reading “Mabanag v. Lopez Vito Case Digest”

Tolentino v. Comelec Case Digest

Tolentino v. ComelecGR No. 148334 Digest by Kirk Yngwie Enriquez Facts:When Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo ascended to the presidency, she nominated then Sen. Teofisto Guingona as VP which Congress confirmed. Sen. Guingona took his oath as VP on February 9, 2001. After the confirmation, the Senate passed Resolution No. 84 on February 8, 2001 certifying the vacancyContinue reading “Tolentino v. Comelec Case Digest”

Arroyo v. De Venecia Case Digest

Arroyo v. De VeneciaGR No. 127255 Digest by Kirk Yngwie Enriquez Facts:Petitioners are members of the House of Reps, challenging the validity of RA 8420 amending certain provisions of the NIRC by imposing so-called “sin taxes” on the manufacture and sale of beer and cigarettes. Petition is against Speaker of the House Jose De Venecia,Continue reading “Arroyo v. De Venecia Case Digest”

Socrates v. Comelec Case Digest

Socrates v. ComelecGR No. 154512 Digest by Kirk Yngwie EnriquezFacts:On July 2, 2002, 312 out of 528 members of then incumbent barangay officials of the Puerto Princesa convened themselves into a Preparatory Recall Assembly (PRA) at the Brgy. San Jose Gymnasium from 9:00am – 12:00noon. The PRA was convened to initiate the recall of VictorinoContinue reading “Socrates v. Comelec Case Digest”

Dimaporo v. Mitra Case Digest

Dimaporo v. Mitra202 SCRA 779 Digest by Kirk Yngwie Enriquez Facts:Petitioner was elected Representatives for the 2nd District of Lanao del Sur during the 1987 Congressional Elections. On January 15, 1990, petitioner filed with the Comelec a Certificate of Candidacy for the position of Regional Governor of the ARMM. Upon being informed of the filing,Continue reading “Dimaporo v. Mitra Case Digest”

Morales v. Subido Case Digest

Morales v. Subido27 SCRA 131 Digest by Kirk Yngwie Enriquez Facts:Petitioner Enrique Morales is the chief of the detective bureau of the Manila Police Department and holds the rank of lieutenant colonel. Upon resignation of Brig. Gen. Ricardo papa on March 14, 1968, petitioner was designated acting chief of police of Manila and given aContinue reading “Morales v. Subido Case Digest”

OSMENA V. PENDATUN Case Digest

OSMENA V. PENDATUN109 Phil 863Digest by Kirk Yngwie Enriquez Facts:On July 14, 1960, petitioner Congressman Sergio Osmena Jr. filed a petition before the SC against respondents Congressman Salipada K. Pendatun and 14 other congressmen in their capacity as members of the Special Committee created by HR 59. He asked for the annulment of the resolutionContinue reading “OSMENA V. PENDATUN Case Digest”

Defensor-Santiago v. Sandiganbayan Case Digest

Defensor-Santiago v. SandiganbayanGR No. 126055Digest by Kirk Yngwie Enriquez Facts:On October 17, 1988, petitioner, then Commissioner of the Commission of Immigration and Deportation, allegedly, with evident bad faith, approve the application for legalization of the stay of 32 aliens, who arrived in the Philippines after January 1, 1984 in violation of EO 324 which prohibitsContinue reading “Defensor-Santiago v. Sandiganbayan Case Digest”

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started